Dodge Durango 2004 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 HP | 238 HP | |
| Torque: | 393 NM | 434 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango and Toyota Land Cruiser have the same engine power, but Dodge Durango torque is 41 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.6 | 16.4 | |
|
The Dodge Durango is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Dodge Durango over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 21 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`995 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |