Dodge Durango 2004 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 4.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 HP | 282 HP | |
| Torque: | 393 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 44 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 47 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.6 | 16.2 | |
|
The Dodge Durango is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Dodge Durango over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.82 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 15 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`995 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |