Dodge Durango 2004 vs Dodge Durango 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 HP | 238 HP | |
| Torque: | 393 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango 2004 and Dodge Durango 2000 have the same engine power, but Dodge Durango 2004 torque is 7 NM less than Dodge Durango 2000. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.6 | 15.4 | |
|
The Dodge Durango 2004 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango 2004 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango 2000, which means that by driving the Dodge Durango 2004 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Dodge Durango 2004 is larger. Dodge Durango 2004 is 19 cm longer than the Dodge Durango 2000, 11 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Durango 2004 is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 535 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2482 litres | |
| Dodge Durango 2004 has 3 litres less trunk space than the Dodge Durango 2000. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`995 | 2`903 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Dodge Durango has
| |