Dodge Durango 2004 vs Chevrolet Tahoe 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 4.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 HP | 290 HP | |
| Torque: | 393 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 52 HP less power than Chevrolet Tahoe, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Chevrolet Tahoe. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.6 | 14.5 | |
| Dodge Durango consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Tahoe, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 246 mm (9.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Chevrolet Tahoe can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 5.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 5 cm longer than the Chevrolet Tahoe, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2920 litres | |
|
Dodge Durango has more luggage capacity. Dodge Durango has 72 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Tahoe. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`995 | 3`085 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Chevrolet Tahoe has
| |