Dodge Durango 2004 vs Audi Q7 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 4.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 HP | 350 HP | |
| Torque: | 393 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 112 HP less power than Audi Q7, whereas torque is 47 NM less than Audi Q7. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.6 | 13.6 | |
|
The Audi Q7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.74 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 1 cm longer than the Audi Q7, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 775 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 775 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 532 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2035 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`995 | 2`935 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |