Dodge Durango 2004 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.7 Petrol | 4.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 213 HP | 396 HP | |
| Torque: | 319 NM | 560 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 183 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 241 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 16.0 | |
|
The Dodge Durango is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Dodge Durango over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge RAM, Dodge Nitro | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Durango might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Dodge Durango engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.82 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 15 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 535 litres | |
| Dodge Durango has 3 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`995 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |