Dodge Durango 1998 vs Volvo XC90 2002

 
Dodge Durango
1998 - 2004
Volvo XC90
2002 - 2006
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 5.2 Petrol2.9 Petrol

Performance

Power: 236 HP272 HP
Torque: 407 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 20.2 seconds9.3 seconds
Volvo XC90 is a more dynamic driving.
Dodge Durango engine produces 36 HP less power than Volvo XC90, but torque is 27 NM more than Volvo XC90. Due to the lower power, Dodge Durango reaches 100 km/h speed 10.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 16.813.0
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Dodge Durango consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 570 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 95 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 560 km in combined cycle530 km in combined cycle
640 km on highway720 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.91 m4.80 m
Width: 1.82 m1.90 m
Height: 1.84 m1.74 m
Dodge Durango is 11 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 10 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 532 litres249 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2482 litres2404 litres
Dodge Durango has more luggage capacity.
Dodge Durango has 283 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Durango (by 78 litres).
Turning diameter: no data12.7 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`9032`760
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 38003400
Pros and Cons: Dodge Durango has
  • roomier boot
Volvo XC90 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv