Dodge Durango 1998 vs Volvo XC90 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.2 Petrol | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 236 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 407 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 20.2 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 73 HP more power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 67 NM more than Volvo XC90. Despite the higher power, Dodge Durango reaches 100 km/h speed 8.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.8 | 9.1 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 7.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 1155 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.74 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 11 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2482 litres | 2404 litres | |
|
Dodge Durango has more luggage capacity. Dodge Durango has 283 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Durango (by 78 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`903 | 2`735 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |