Dodge Durango 1998 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.2 Petrol | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 236 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 407 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 20.2 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 71 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 34 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite the higher power, Dodge Durango reaches 100 km/h speed 6.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.8 | 10.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 6.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 945 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 11 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2482 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`903 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |