Dodge Durango 1998 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.2 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 236 HP | 238 HP | |
| Torque: | 407 NM | 434 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 20.2 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is a more dynamic driving. Dodge Durango engine produces 2 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Due to the lower power, Dodge Durango reaches 100 km/h speed 9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.8 | 16.4 | |
| Dodge Durango consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 96 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 2 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2482 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`903 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |