Dodge Durango 1998 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.2 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 236 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 407 NM | 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 20.2 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 73 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 64 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. Despite the higher power, Dodge Durango reaches 100 km/h speed 7.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.8 | 10.4 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 6.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 960 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.90 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 6 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2482 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`903 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |