Dodge Durango 1998 vs Nissan Patrol 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.2 Petrol | 4.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 236 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 407 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 20.2 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Nissan Patrol is a more dynamic driving. Dodge Durango engine produces 9 HP less power than Nissan Patrol, but torque is 7 NM more than Nissan Patrol. Due to the lower power, Dodge Durango reaches 100 km/h speed 9.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.8 | 18.2 | |
| Dodge Durango consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Patrol, which means that by driving the Dodge Durango over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km on highway | 660 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 5.01 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Dodge Durango is smaller. Dodge Durango is 10 cm shorter than the Nissan Patrol, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 8 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 183 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 183 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 532 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2482 litres | 2287 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Durango (by 195 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`903 | 3`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Nissan Patrol has
| |