Dodge Durango 1998 vs Mercedes ML 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.2 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 236 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 407 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 20.2 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 18 HP more power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 97 NM more than Mercedes ML. Despite the higher power, Dodge Durango reaches 100 km/h speed 10.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.8 | 13.8 | |
|
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 450 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km on highway | 640 km on highway | ||
| Dodge Durango gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 32 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2482 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`903 | 2`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |