Dodge Durango 1998 vs Lexus RX 2003
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 5.2 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 236 HP | 204 HP | |
Torque: | 407 NM | 283 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 20.2 seconds | 9 seconds | |
Dodge Durango engine produces 32 HP more power than Lexus RX, whereas torque is 124 NM more than Lexus RX. Despite the higher power, Dodge Durango reaches 100 km/h speed 11.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.8 | 12.2 | |
The Lexus RX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 4.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Lexus RX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 690 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 72 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
640 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
Lexus RX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.91 m | 4.74 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.84 m | 1.68 m | |
Dodge Durango is 17 cm longer than the Lexus RX, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 16 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 439 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2482 litres | 2130 litres | |
Dodge Durango has more luggage capacity. Dodge Durango has 93 litres more trunk space than the Lexus RX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Durango (by 352 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`903 | 2`380 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3200 | 7000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Lexus RX has
| |