Dodge Durango 1998 vs Land Rover Range Rover 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.2 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 236 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 407 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 20.2 seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 100 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 137 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover. Despite the higher power, Dodge Durango reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.8 | 11.4 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 5.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 810 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 20 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2482 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`903 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |