Dodge Durango 1998 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.2 Petrol | 4.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 236 HP | 282 HP | |
| Torque: | 407 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 20.2 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is a more dynamic driving. Dodge Durango engine produces 46 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 33 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Due to the lower power, Dodge Durango reaches 100 km/h speed 11 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.8 | 16.2 | |
| Dodge Durango consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Dodge Durango is smaller, but slightly higher. Dodge Durango is 4 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2482 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`903 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |