Dodge Durango 1998 vs Ford Explorer 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.2 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 236 HP | 207 HP | |
| Torque: | 407 NM | 339 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 20.2 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 29 HP more power than Ford Explorer, whereas torque is 68 NM more than Ford Explorer. Despite the higher power, Dodge Durango reaches 100 km/h speed 9.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.8 | 13.7 | |
|
The Ford Explorer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Explorer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 465 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 10 cm longer than the Ford Explorer, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2482 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`903 | 2`568 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Ford Explorer has
| |