Dodge Durango 1998 vs Chevrolet Tahoe 2000
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 5.2 Petrol | 5.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 236 HP | 273 HP | |
Torque: | 407 NM | 427 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 20.2 seconds | 12 seconds | |
Chevrolet Tahoe is a more dynamic driving. Dodge Durango engine produces 37 HP less power than Chevrolet Tahoe, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Chevrolet Tahoe. Due to the lower power, Dodge Durango reaches 100 km/h speed 8.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.8 | 15.4 | |
The Chevrolet Tahoe is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Tahoe, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 98 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
640 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
Chevrolet Tahoe gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ground clearance: | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | 246 mm (9.7 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Chevrolet Tahoe can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.91 m | 5.05 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 2.07 m | |
Height: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
Dodge Durango is smaller, but slightly higher. Dodge Durango is 14 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Tahoe, 25 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 460 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2482 litres | 2920 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Dodge Durango has 72 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Tahoe. The Chevrolet Tahoe may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Tahoe (by 438 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`903 | 3`084 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3600 | 6800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Chevrolet Tahoe has
| |