Dodge Durango 2013 vs Volvo XC90 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Dodge Durango is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo XC90 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Dodge Durango also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.6 - 6.4 (petrol) | 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 294 - 481 HP | 190 - 320 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 - 637 NM | 350 - 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5.6 - 9.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 - 15.7 | 2.1 - 8.1 | |
|
Dodge Durango petrol engines consumes on average 5.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 203 - 207 mm (8 - 8.1 inches) | 238 mm (9.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.11 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 16 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2410 litres | 1886 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Dodge Durango has 125 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC90. This could mean that the Dodge Durango uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Durango (by 524 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`057 | ~ 2`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 200 | 26 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |