Dodge Durango 2013 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Dodge Durango is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota Land Cruiser can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Dodge Durango also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.6 - 6.4 (petrol) | 4.5 - 5.7 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Toyota Land Cruiser is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 294 - 481 HP | 272 - 381 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 - 637 NM | 460 - 650 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.6 - 8.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 - 15.7 | 9.5 - 15.0 | |
|
Dodge Durango petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Land Cruiser. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 203 - 207 mm (8 - 8.1 inches) | 226 mm (8.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Land Cruiser can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.11 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.87 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 16 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2410 litres | 2313 litres | |
|
Dodge Durango has more luggage capacity. Dodge Durango has 34 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Durango (by 97 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Durango is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Dodge Durango can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`057 | ~ 3`333 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 600 | 31 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |