Dodge Durango 2013 vs Dodge Journey 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dodge Durango is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Dodge Journey can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Dodge Durango also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
Engines: | 3.6 - 6.4 | 2.4 - 3.6 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 294 - 481 HP | 173 - 280 HP | |
Torque: | 353 - 637 NM | 225 - 353 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 - 15.7 | no data | |
Ground clearance: | 203 - 207 mm (8 - 8.1 inches) | 182 mm (7.2 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Dodge Durango can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.11 m | 4.89 m | |
Width: | 1.92 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.80 m | 1.69 m | |
Dodge Durango is larger. Dodge Durango is 23 cm longer than the Dodge Journey, 9 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Durango is 11 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2410 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`057 | ~ 2`461 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 27 200 | 12 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Dodge Journey has
| |