Dodge Durango 1998 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Dodge Durango is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Land Rover Range Rover can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Dodge Durango also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.9 - 5.9 (petrol) | 2.9 - 4.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Land Rover Range Rover is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 - 250 HP | 177 - 282 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 - 454 NM | 390 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 - 20.2 seconds | 9.2 - 13.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.2 - 19.2 | 11.3 - 16.2 | |
|
On average, the Dodge Durango petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Land Rover Range Rover. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Dodge Durango is smaller, but slightly higher. Dodge Durango is 4 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 14 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 535 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2482 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`877 kg | ~ 3`500 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |