Dodge Durango 1998 vs Ford Explorer 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dodge Durango is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Ford Explorer has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 3.9 - 5.9 | 4.0 - 5.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 - 250 HP | 212 - 304 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 - 454 NM | 344 - 495 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 - 20.2 seconds | 8.6 - 9.4 seconds | |
| In general, Ford Explorer are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Dodge Durango. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.2 - 19.2 | 13.0 - 14.6 | |
|
Dodge Durango petrol engines consumes on average 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Explorer. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 9 cm longer than the Ford Explorer, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 535 litres | 391 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2482 litres | no data | |
|
Dodge Durango has more luggage capacity. Dodge Durango has 144 litres more trunk space than the Ford Explorer. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`877 kg | ~ 2`595 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Ford Explorer has
| |