Dodge Durango 2004 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dodge Durango is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Toyota Land Cruiser has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Dodge Durango is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota Land Cruiser can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Dodge Durango also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.7 - 5.7 (petrol) | 4.2 - 4.7 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 213 - 349 HP | 204 - 238 HP | |
| Torque: | 319 - 509 NM | 430 - 434 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.2 - 13.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 - 14.6 | 11.1 - 16.4 | |
|
Dodge Durango petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Land Cruiser. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 21 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`995 | ~ 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |