Dodge Durango 2004 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Dodge Durango is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Land Rover Range Rover can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Dodge Durango also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.7 - 5.7 (petrol) | 2.9 - 4.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 213 - 349 HP | 174 - 396 HP | |
| Torque: | 319 - 509 NM | 390 - 640 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.5 - 13.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 - 14.6 | 11.3 - 16.0 | |
|
Dodge Durango petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Range Rover. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.82 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 15 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 535 litres | |
| Dodge Durango has 3 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`995 | ~ 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |