Dodge Durango 2004 vs Ford F150 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.7 - 5.7 | 4.6 - 5.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 213 - 349 HP | 231 - 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 319 - 509 NM | 397 - 495 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 - 14.6 | 13.2 - 14.7 | |
|
Dodge Durango petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford F150. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 5.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.90 m | |
|
Dodge Durango is smaller. Dodge Durango is 58 cm shorter than the Ford F150, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13.7 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`995 kg | ~ 3`149 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
| |