Dodge Durango 2004 vs Chevrolet Tahoe 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.7 - 5.7 | 4.8 - 6.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 213 - 349 HP | 273 - 305 HP | |
| Torque: | 319 - 509 NM | 393 - 481 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 - 14.6 | 12.5 - 15.7 | |
|
Dodge Durango petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Tahoe. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 246 mm (9.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Chevrolet Tahoe can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 5.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 5 cm longer than the Chevrolet Tahoe, 8 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2920 litres | |
|
Dodge Durango has more luggage capacity. Dodge Durango has 72 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Tahoe. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`995 | ~ 3`026 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Chevrolet Tahoe has
| |