Dodge Charger 2012 vs Mercedes C class 2007
Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 6.4 Petrol | 6.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 477 HP | 457 HP | |
Torque: | 637 NM | 600 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 4.5 seconds | |
Dodge Charger engine produces 20 HP more power than Mercedes C class, whereas torque is 37 NM more than Mercedes C class. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.8 | 13.4 | |
Dodge Charger consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Charger could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 66 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 490 km in combined cycle | |
700 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.08 m | 4.73 m | |
Width: | 1.91 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.44 m | |
Dodge Charger is larger. Dodge Charger is 35 cm longer than the Mercedes C class, 11 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Charger is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 437 litres | 475 litres | |
Mercedes C class has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Dodge Charger has 38 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes C class. This could mean that the Dodge Charger uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.75 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 5600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes C klase has
| |