Dodge Charger 2009 vs Ford Mustang 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 5.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 375 HP | 500 HP | |
| Torque: | 536 NM | 650 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 4.5 seconds | |
| Dodge Charger engine produces 125 HP less power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 114 NM less than Ford Mustang. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 11.6 | |
|
The Ford Mustang is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Charger consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Charger could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 640 km on highway | ||
| Dodge Charger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Dodge Charger is larger. Dodge Charger is 33 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, 1 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Charger is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 348 litres | |
|
Dodge Charger has more luggage capacity. Dodge Charger has 112 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mustang. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |