Dodge Charger 2009 vs Chevrolet Impala 2006
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 5.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 375 HP | 307 HP | |
| Torque: | 536 NM | 438 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
| Dodge Charger engine produces 68 HP more power than Chevrolet Impala, whereas torque is 98 NM more than Chevrolet Impala. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 10.2 | |
|
The Chevrolet Impala is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Charger consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Impala, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Charger could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Dodge Charger and Chevrolet Impala are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 527 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Impala has more luggage space. Dodge Charger has 67 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Impala. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
Chevrolet Impala has
| |