Dodge Charger 2006 vs Chrysler 300C 2006
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 6.1 Petrol | 6.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 432 HP | 425 HP | |
| Torque: | 569 NM | 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 seconds | 5 seconds | |
| Dodge Charger engine produces 7 HP more power than Chrysler 300C, but torque is 1 NM less than Chrysler 300C. Thanks to more power Dodge Charger reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.7 | 14.0 | |
| Dodge Charger consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Charger could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 510 km in combined cycle | 500 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Dodge Charger is 6 cm longer than the Chrysler 300C, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 504 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 504 litres | |
|
Chrysler 300C has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Dodge Charger has 44 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 300C. This could mean that the Dodge Charger uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Charger is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chrysler 300C. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`355 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |