Dodge Charger 2006 vs Dodge Charger 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 6.1 Petrol | 6.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 432 HP | 477 HP | |
| Torque: | 569 NM | 637 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Dodge Charger 2006 engine produces 45 HP less power than Dodge Charger 2012, whereas torque is 68 NM less than Dodge Charger 2012. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.7 | 13.8 | |
|
The Dodge Charger 2012 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Charger 2006 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Charger 2012, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Charger 2006 could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 510 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Dodge Charger 2006 and Dodge Charger 2012 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 437 litres | |
|
Dodge Charger 2006 has more luggage capacity. Dodge Charger 2006 has 23 litres more trunk space than the Dodge Charger 2012. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Dodge Charger has
| |