Dodge Charger 2015 vs BMW 6 series 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Dodge Charger) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (BMW 6 series) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 296 HP | 313 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 630 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5.4 seconds | |
| Dodge Charger engine produces 17 HP less power than BMW 6 series, whereas torque is 277 NM less than BMW 6 series. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 5.4 | |
|
The BMW 6 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Charger consumes 4.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 6 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Charger could require 690 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 1290 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| BMW 6 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 124 mm (4.9 inches) | 126 mm (5 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Dodge Charger engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Charger might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Dodge Charger 2015 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Dodge Charger 2015 3.6 engine BMW 6 sērija 2015 3.0 engine: The N57 engine is a robust turbo diesel unit without any major systemic issues. Its longevity depends heavily on regular maintenance, including timely servicing, periodic cleaning of the intake system, and active regeneration of the diesel particulate filter. The ... More about BMW 6 sērija 2015 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.04 m | 5.01 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Dodge Charger is larger. Dodge Charger is 3 cm longer than the BMW 6 series, 1 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Charger is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 436 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1265 litres | |
|
BMW 6 series has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Dodge Charger has 24 litres less trunk space than the BMW 6 series. This could mean that the Dodge Charger uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Charger is 0.5 metres less than that of the BMW 6 series, which means Dodge Charger can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`410 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 600 | 25 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
BMW 6 sērija has
| |
