Dodge Charger 2010 vs Mercedes C class 2007
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 6.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 375 HP | 457 HP | |
| Torque: | 536 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 4.5 seconds | |
| Dodge Charger engine produces 82 HP less power than Mercedes C class, whereas torque is 64 NM less than Mercedes C class. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 13.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 15.0 l/100km | 16.2 l/100km | |
|
The Dodge Charger is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Dodge Charger consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class, which means that by driving the Dodge Charger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dodge Charger consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 490 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
| 480 km with real consumption | 400 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
|
Dodge Charger has 4x4: Automatic all-wheel drive (Borg-Warner 44-40 transfer case). Rear wheel drive under normal driving conditions. Front wheels are engaged and up to 38% of torque is sent to the front wheels when at least one of the following conditions occurs: rear wheels spin is detected, windshield wipers are in constant use, outside air temperature is below 0C (32F), transmission is in manual mode, traction control is off. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Dodge Charger is larger. Dodge Charger is 35 cm longer than the Mercedes C class, 11 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Charger is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 467 litres | 475 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Dodge Charger has 8 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes C class. This could mean that the Dodge Charger uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.75 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Charger is 0.050000000000001 metres more than that of the Mercedes C class. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
Mercedes C klase has
| |