Dodge Charger 2010 vs Dodge Charger 2015

 
Dodge Charger
2010 - 2015
Dodge Charger
2015 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 5.7 Petrol5.7 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 375 HP375 HP
Torque: 536 NM536 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a secondsn/a seconds
Dodge Charger 2010 and Dodge Charger 2015 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 13.012.1
The Dodge Charger 2015 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Dodge Charger 2010 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Charger 2015, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Charger 2010 could require 135 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 72 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 550 km in combined cycle570 km in combined cycle
700 km on highway740 km on highway

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dodge Charger has 4x4: Automatic all-wheel drive (Borg-Warner 44-40 transfer case). Rear wheel drive under normal driving conditions. Front wheels are engaged and up to 38% of torque is sent to the front wheels when at least one of the following conditions occurs: rear wheels spin is detected, windshield wipers are in constant use, outside air temperature is below 0C (32F), transmission is in manual mode, traction control is off.

Ground clearance: 128 mm (5 inches)137 mm (5.4 inches)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 480'000 km480'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 16 years16 years

Dimensions

Length: 5.08 m5.04 m
Width: 1.91 m1.91 m
Height: 1.48 m1.48 m
Both cars are similar in size. Dodge Charger 2010 is 4 cm longer than the Dodge Charger 2015, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 467 litres467 litres
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters11.5 meters
The turning circle of the Dodge Charger 2010 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Dodge Charger 2015.
Gross weight (kg): no datano data
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no datano data
Pros and Cons: Dodge Charger has
  • has 4x4 drive
Dodge Charger has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv