Dodge Charger 2010 vs Dodge Charger 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 375 HP | 375 HP | |
| Torque: | 536 NM | 536 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Dodge Charger 2010 and Dodge Charger 2005 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 13.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 15.0 l/100km | 15.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Dodge Charger 2010 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Charger 2005, which means that by driving the Dodge Charger 2010 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dodge Charger 2010 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Charger 2005. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 740 km on highway | ||
| 480 km with real consumption | 480 km with real consumption | ||
| Dodge Charger 2005 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Dodge Charger 2010: Automatic all-wheel drive (Borg-Warner 44-40 transfer case). Rear wheel drive under normal driving conditions. Front wheels are engaged and up to 38% of torque is sent to the front wheels when at least one of the following conditions occurs: rear wheels spin is detected, windshield wipers are in constant use, outside air temperature is below 0C (32F), transmission is in manual mode, traction control is off. Dodge Charger 2005: Until 2008 - Full-time four-wheel drive, torque split - 38% front, 62% rear. 2009 and newer - Automatic four-wheel drive (Borg-Warner 44-40 transfer case). Rear wheel drive under normal driving conditions. Front wheels are engaged and up to 38% of torque is sent to the front wheels when at least one of the following conditions occurs: rear wheels spin is detected, windshield wipers are in constant use, outside air temperature is below 0C (32F), transmission is in manual mode, traction control is off. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Dodge Charger 2010 and Dodge Charger 2005 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 467 litres | 456 litres | |
| Dodge Charger 2010 has 11 litres more trunk space than the Dodge Charger 2005. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Charger 2010 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Dodge Charger 2005. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Dodge Charger has
| |