Dodge Charger 2010 vs Dodge Charger 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 375 HP | 345 HP | |
| Torque: | 536 NM | 525 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6 seconds | |
| Dodge Charger 2010 engine produces 30 HP more power than Dodge Charger 2005, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Dodge Charger 2005. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.1 | 11.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 15.0 l/100km | 12.8 l/100km | |
|
The Dodge Charger 2005 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dodge Charger 2010 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Charger 2005, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Charger 2010 could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dodge Charger 2010 consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Charger 2005. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| 480 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Dodge Charger 2005 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Dodge RAM, Dodge Durango | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler 300C | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Charger 2010 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Dodge Charger 2010 and Dodge Charger 2005 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 467 litres | 456 litres | |
| Dodge Charger 2010 has 11 litres more trunk space than the Dodge Charger 2005. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Charger 2010 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Dodge Charger 2005, which means Dodge Charger 2010 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
Dodge Charger has
| |