Dodge Charger 2010 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 6.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 375 HP | 405 HP | |
| Torque: | 536 NM | 556 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 4.7 seconds | |
| Dodge Charger engine produces 30 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.1 | 14.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 15.0 l/100km | 13.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Dodge Charger consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro, which means that by driving the Dodge Charger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Dodge Charger consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.36 m | |
| Dodge Charger is 24 cm longer than the Chevrolet Camaro, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Charger is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 467 litres | 364 litres | |
|
Dodge Charger has more luggage capacity. Dodge Charger has 103 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 15 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |