Dodge Charger 2010 vs Mercedes C class 2007

 
Dodge Charger
2010 - 2015
Mercedes C class
2007 - 2011
Body: CoupeSedan
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.6 Petrol3.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainDouble-row timing chain

Performance

Power: 296 HP272 HP
Torque: 353 NM350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds6.4 seconds
Dodge Charger engine produces 24 HP more power than Mercedes C class, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Mercedes C class.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.910.0
The Mercedes C class is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Dodge Charger consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Charger could require 135 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 72 litres66 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 660 km in combined cycle660 km in combined cycle
820 km on highway880 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 460'000 km450'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 15 years13 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Town & CountryInstalled on at least 9 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes S klase
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Dodge Charger 2010 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles. After ...  More about Dodge Charger 2010 3.6 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 5.08 m4.58 m
Width: 1.91 m1.77 m
Height: 1.48 m1.45 m
Dodge Charger is larger.
Dodge Charger is 50 cm longer than the Mercedes C class, 14 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Charger is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 467 litres475 litres
Despite its longer length, Dodge Charger has 8 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes C class. This could mean that the Dodge Charger uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters10.84 meters
The turning circle of the Dodge Charger is 0.96 metres more than that of the Mercedes C class, which means Dodge Charger can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no datano data
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): no data5600
Pros and Cons: Dodge Charger has
  • more power
Mercedes C klase has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv