Dodge Charger 2010 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 296 HP | 328 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 377 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.2 seconds | |
| Dodge Charger engine produces 32 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 10.9 | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
|
Dodge Charger has 4x4: Automatic all-wheel drive (Borg-Warner 44-40 transfer case). Rear wheel drive under normal driving conditions. Front wheels are engaged and up to 38% of torque is sent to the front wheels when at least one of the following conditions occurs: rear wheels spin is detected, windshield wipers are in constant use, outside air temperature is below 0C (32F), transmission is in manual mode, traction control is off. | |||
| Dodge Charger 2010 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Dodge Charger 2010 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.36 m | |
| Dodge Charger is 24 cm longer than the Chevrolet Camaro, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Charger is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 467 litres | 364 litres | |
|
Dodge Charger has more luggage capacity. Dodge Charger has 103 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |