Dodge Charger 2010 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 296 HP | 328 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 377 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.2 seconds | |
| Dodge Charger engine produces 32 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 10.9 | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
|
Dodge Charger has 4x4: Automatic all-wheel drive (Borg-Warner 44-40 transfer case). Rear wheel drive under normal driving conditions. Front wheels are engaged and up to 38% of torque is sent to the front wheels when at least one of the following conditions occurs: rear wheels spin is detected, windshield wipers are in constant use, outside air temperature is below 0C (32F), transmission is in manual mode, traction control is off. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.36 m | |
| Dodge Charger is 24 cm longer than the Chevrolet Camaro, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Charger is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 467 litres | 364 litres | |
|
Dodge Charger has more luggage capacity. Dodge Charger has 103 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 15 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |