Dodge Charger 2010 vs Dodge Charger 2005
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 296 HP | 253 HP | |
Torque: | 353 NM | 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
Dodge Charger 2010 engine produces 43 HP more power than Dodge Charger 2005, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Dodge Charger 2005. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 10.7 | |
The Dodge Charger 2010 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Charger 2010 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Charger 2005, which means that by driving the Dodge Charger 2010 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 68 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
940 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
Dodge Charger 2010 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dodge Charger 2010 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Dodge Charger 2010 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.08 m | 5.08 m | |
Width: | 1.91 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Dodge Charger 2010 and Dodge Charger 2005 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 467 litres | 456 litres | |
Dodge Charger 2010 has 11 litres more trunk space than the Dodge Charger 2005. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Dodge Charger 2010 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Dodge Charger 2005, which means Dodge Charger 2010 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`185 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 6800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
| |