Dodge Charger 2010 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 296 HP | 328 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 377 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.2 seconds | |
| Dodge Charger engine produces 32 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 10.9 | |
|
The Dodge Charger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Charger consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro, which means that by driving the Dodge Charger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Dodge Charger 2010 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Dodge Charger 2010 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.36 m | |
| Dodge Charger is 24 cm longer than the Chevrolet Camaro, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Charger is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 467 litres | 364 litres | |
|
Dodge Charger has more luggage capacity. Dodge Charger has 103 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |