Dodge Charger 2005 vs Chrysler 300C 2005

 
Dodge Charger
2005 - 2010
Chrysler 300C
2005 - 2011
Body: CoupeSedan
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 5.7 Petrol5.7 Petrol

Performance

Power: 375 HP340 HP
Torque: 536 NM525 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a secondsn/a seconds
Dodge Charger engine produces 35 HP more power than Chrysler 300C, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Chrysler 300C.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 13.112.1
Real fuel consumption: 15.6 l/100km14.2 l/100km
The Chrysler 300C is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Dodge Charger consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Charger could require 150 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dodge Charger consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C.
Fuel tank capacity: 76 litres71 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 580 km in combined cycle580 km in combined cycle
740 km on highway690 km on highway
480 km with real consumption500 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 5.08 m5.02 m
Width: 1.89 m1.88 m
Height: 1.48 m1.48 m
Both cars are similar in size. Dodge Charger is 6 cm longer than the Chrysler 300C, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 456 litres504 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data504 litres
Chrysler 300C has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Dodge Charger has 48 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 300C. This could mean that the Dodge Charger uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Dodge Charger is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chrysler 300C.
Gross weight (kg): no datano data
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 68004000
Pros and Cons: Dodge Charger has
  • more power
Chrysler 300C has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv