Dodge Charger 2005 vs Ford Mustang 2006

 
Dodge Charger
2005 - 2010
Ford Mustang
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 5.7 Petrol5.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 375 HP500 HP
Torque: 536 NM650 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds4.5 seconds
Dodge Charger engine produces 125 HP less power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 114 NM less than Ford Mustang.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 13.111.6
The Ford Mustang is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Dodge Charger consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Charger could require 225 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 76 litres61 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 580 km in combined cycle520 km in combined cycle
740 km on highway640 km on highway
Dodge Charger gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Dodge Charger has 4x4: Until 2008 - Full-time four-wheel drive, torque split - 38% front, 62% rear. 2009 and newer - Automatic four-wheel drive (Borg-Warner 44-40 transfer case). Rear wheel drive under normal driving conditions. Front wheels are engaged and up to 38% of torque is sent to the front wheels when at least one of the following conditions occurs: rear wheels spin is detected, windshield wipers are in constant use, outside air temperature is below 0C (32F), transmission is in manual mode, traction control is off.

Dimensions

Length: 5.08 m4.75 m
Width: 1.89 m1.88 m
Height: 1.48 m1.38 m
Dodge Charger is larger.
Dodge Charger is 33 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, 1 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Charger is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 456 litres348 litres
Dodge Charger has more luggage capacity.
Dodge Charger has 108 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mustang.
Turning diameter: 11.9 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): no datano data
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 680011 600
Pros and Cons: Dodge Charger has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Ford Mustang has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv