Dodge Charger 2005 vs Chrysler 300C 2004
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 355 HP | 340 HP | |
| Torque: | 525 NM | 525 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
| Dodge Charger engine produces 15 HP more power than Chrysler 300C, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 12.0 | |
| Dodge Charger consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C, which means that by driving the Dodge Charger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Dodge Charger is 6 cm longer than the Chrysler 300C, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 504 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 504 litres | |
|
Chrysler 300C has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Dodge Charger has 48 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 300C. This could mean that the Dodge Charger uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Charger is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chrysler 300C. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`280 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |