Dodge Charger 2005 vs Mercedes CL 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 5.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 355 HP | 500 HP | |
| Torque: | 525 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 4.8 seconds | |
| Dodge Charger engine produces 145 HP less power than Mercedes CL, whereas torque is 175 NM less than Mercedes CL. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 13.2 | |
|
The Dodge Charger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Charger consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CL, which means that by driving the Dodge Charger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 88 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Dodge Charger is larger. Dodge Charger is 9 cm longer than the Mercedes CL, 3 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Charger is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 450 litres | |
| Dodge Charger has 6 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes CL. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Charger is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mercedes CL, which means Dodge Charger can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
Mercedes CL has
| |