Dodge Charger 2005 vs Ford Mustang 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 5.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 355 HP | 500 HP | |
| Torque: | 525 NM | 650 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 4.5 seconds | |
| Dodge Charger engine produces 145 HP less power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 125 NM less than Ford Mustang. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 11.6 | |
| Dodge Charger consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Charger could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 640 km on highway | ||
| Dodge Charger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Dodge Charger is larger. Dodge Charger is 33 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, 1 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Charger is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 348 litres | |
|
Dodge Charger has more luggage capacity. Dodge Charger has 108 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mustang. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |