Dodge Charger 2005 vs Peugeot 407 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 345 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 525 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Dodge Charger is more dynamic to drive. Dodge Charger engine produces 141 HP more power than Peugeot 407, whereas torque is 85 NM more than Peugeot 407. Thanks to more power Dodge Charger reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 8.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.8 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 407 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dodge Charger consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 407, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Charger could require 495 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dodge Charger consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 407. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 407 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Dodge Charger engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler 300C | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Charger might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Dodge Charger is larger. Dodge Charger is 26 cm longer than the Peugeot 407, 2 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Charger is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 400 litres | |
|
Dodge Charger has more luggage capacity. Dodge Charger has 56 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 407. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Charger is 0.2 metres more than that of the Peugeot 407. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
Peugeot 407 has
| |