Dodge Charger 2005 vs Chrysler 300C 2004
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 345 HP | 340 HP | |
| Torque: | 525 NM | 525 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
|
Dodge Charger is more dynamic to drive. Dodge Charger engine produces 5 HP more power than Chrysler 300C, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Dodge Charger reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 12.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.8 l/100km | 14.1 l/100km | |
|
The Dodge Charger is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Dodge Charger consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C, which means that by driving the Dodge Charger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dodge Charger consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 500 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 4 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Dodge Charger is 6 cm longer than the Chrysler 300C, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 504 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 504 litres | |
|
Chrysler 300C has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Dodge Charger has 48 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 300C. This could mean that the Dodge Charger uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Charger is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chrysler 300C. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`280 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |