Dodge Charger 2005 vs Ford Mustang 2005
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 4.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 345 HP | 304 HP | |
Torque: | 525 NM | 427 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Dodge Charger engine produces 41 HP more power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 98 NM more than Ford Mustang. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 13.0 | |
Dodge Charger consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that by driving the Dodge Charger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 61 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 460 km in combined cycle | |
800 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
Dodge Charger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.08 m | 4.77 m | |
Width: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.39 m | |
Dodge Charger is larger. Dodge Charger is 32 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, 2 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Charger is 9 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 350 litres | |
Dodge Charger has more luggage capacity. Dodge Charger has 106 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mustang. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 6800 | 10 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
| |