Dodge Charger 2005 vs Ford Mustang 2005

 
Dodge Charger
2005 - 2010
Ford Mustang
2005 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 5.7 Petrol4.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 345 HP304 HP
Torque: 525 NM427 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6 secondsn/a seconds
Dodge Charger engine produces 41 HP more power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 98 NM more than Ford Mustang.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.813.0
Dodge Charger consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that by driving the Dodge Charger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 76 litres61 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 640 km in combined cycle460 km in combined cycle
800 km on highway670 km on highway
Dodge Charger gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 5.08 m4.77 m
Width: 1.89 m1.88 m
Height: 1.48 m1.39 m
Dodge Charger is larger.
Dodge Charger is 32 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, 2 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Charger is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 456 litres350 litres
Dodge Charger has more luggage capacity.
Dodge Charger has 106 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mustang.
Turning diameter: 11.9 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): no datano data
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 680010 000
Pros and Cons: Dodge Charger has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv